Net-Base FAQ

FAQ — Project start, architecture and collaboration

Central questions and answers on enterprise software, Delphi, portals, modernization, architecture and platform objectives.

Questions? Answers? Next step?

The FAQ center for enterprise software, Delphi, portals, architecture, and modernization.

Delphi? Portal? Architecture? How to start?

What fits?

Recurring questions from the specialist pages are consolidated in a clear, color‑coded, quickly scannable format.

What goes together?

Short answers are directly associated with architecture, modernization, portals and platforms.

What happens next?

Each FAQ block directs to the corresponding detail page with greater depth, context and the next step.

Questions and Answers

Central FAQ Overview

Appropriate performance and technical paths

Important deep dives into this topic



FAQ landing page

Central questions and answers on project initiation, services, enterprise software, Delphi, architecture, portals, services and modernization.

FAQ
Delphi
Portals
Modernization

This page collects the most frequent questions from our homepage, the overview pages and the technical subpages in one place. The compact FAQs deliberately remain on the respective detail pages. Here we additionally arrange them as a landing page so that prospects can quickly see which topics we truly master in project initiation, services, Delphi, C#, Layer-3, portals, modernization, data access and platform strategy.

You can either jump directly to a topic block or navigate from below to the respective detailed page. This keeps the page usable both as a quick entry point and as a structured FAQ hub.


Project initiation

Project initiation, architecture & collaboration

Questions about a sensible project entry, system assessment and early architecture decisions.

Directly to the answers



Services

Services overview

Questions about takeover of existing systems, modernization, services, data access and long-term support.

Directly to the answers



Technologies

Technology and Architecture at a Glance

Questions about Delphi, C#, Layer-3, platform choice and the technical direction across multiple expansion phases.

Directly to the answers



Projects

Project profiles and reference patterns

Questions about project size, operational responsibility, hosting, product logic and long-lived systems.

Directly to the answers



Enterprise software

Custom enterprise software & Layer-3

Questions about cost-effectiveness, process logic, roles, data and long-term extensibility.

Directly to the answers



Capabilities

Multi-platform with Delphi

Questions about Windows, macOS, Linux as well as later iOS and Android paths stemming from shared domain logic.

Directly to the answers



Capabilities

Services, REST-servers & portals

Questions about portals, APIs, Windows- and Linux-services as part of the same domain architecture.

Directly to the answers



Integration

Interfaces, data flows & platform objectives

Questions about financial accounting, APIs, database refactoring, mapping, monitoring and new target platforms.

Directly to the answers



Delphi

Delphi for enterprise applications

Why Delphi can remain strong for mature business logic, reports and productive desktop processes.

Directly to the answers



C#

C# for services & portals

Questions about REST, integrations, portals, backend services and stable operation.

Directly to the answers



Architecture

Layer-3 architecture

Questions about the separation of UI, business logic and data access and why that is directly economically relevant.

Directly to the answers



Delphi-Team

Delphi developers from Freiburg

Questions about external support, takeover of existing systems and technical responsibility in established Delphi systems.

Directly to the answers



Support

Delphi-Maintenance & Support

Questions about stabilization, continued development, release reliability and reduction of single-person knowledge.

Directly to the answers



Modernization

Delphi-Modernization

Questions about migration path, risk, preserving domain logic and staged renewal during live operation.

Directly to the answers



Data access

BDE-Replacement

Questions about FireDAC, native drivers, SQL peculiarities, deployment and database reorganization.

Directly to the answers



PostgreSQL

Delphi, PostgreSQL & FireDAC

Questions about PostgreSQL migration, native drivers, SQL behavior and a smooth data-access migration.

Directly to the answers



Delphi REST

Delphi REST-API & REST-Server

Questions about REST with Delphi, API scoping, shared domain logic and clean server architecture.

Directly to the answers



Services

Windows- & Linux-Services

Questions about background services, scheduling, monitoring, restart behavior and a clean operational scope.

Directly to the answers



Technology

Delphi Multiplatform

Questions about a shared codebase for Windows, macOS and Linux with controlled platform boundaries.

Directly to the answers



Server architecture

REST-Server & Services

Questions about APIs, Windows- and Linux-services, server logic, monitoring and operational responsibility.

Directly to the answers



Platform

Windows 11 ARM64

Questions about new hardware, native dependencies, drivers, builds and rollout paths.

Directly to the answers

Project start

Project start, Architecture & Collaboration

Many initial questions are not about a single technology, but about the right starting point: What should be clarified first, how is technical orientation established, and how does an idea become a robust entry into a real project?

The homepage usually raises the first orientation questions: How should an initiative sensibly begin, which architectural questions should be clarified early, and when is modernization preferable to hasty redevelopment?

When is Delphi modernization preferable to a complete redevelopment?

If business logic, processes and the data model are valuable, a controlled restructuring is often more economical than a restart with loss of functionality and high deployment risk.

Can the same business logic run for Windows, macOS and Linux?

Yes. Especially in Delphi projects we design shared business logic and separate presentation, services and data access so multiple platforms can be served cleanly.

Does Net-Base also build REST servers and background services?

Yes. Windows and Linux services, REST APIs, integration layers and deployment are part of the architecture for us and are not retrofitted afterwards.

How does a typical project start?

Usually with a structured assessment: objectives, existing systems, database, platforms, interfaces and operational risks. From this a realistically tailored starting point emerges.

Read more on the topic

If you want to move from this FAQ to the more in-depth technical page, you will find there the broader context with architecture, examples, decision rationales and related topics.

View the homepage in detail

Services

Overview of services

The services page usually generates the broadest follow-up questions: What do we take on concretely, how far does our technical responsibility extend, and how do modernization, integrations, operations and ongoing development interact?

Especially with evolved applications the same business and technical questions often arise. We clarify these points early, before an initiative becomes a diffuse large-scale project.

Do you also take over existing Delphi systems?

Yes. We regularly take over established Delphi applications, analyze the existing system, data access, architecture and edge cases, and continue in a controlled manner.

Can REST servers, portals and desktop clients be created from a single project?

Yes. Especially for enterprise applications we deliberately plan these components together so the same business logic does not fragment into multiple bespoke solutions.

Is an BDE replacement possible without a full-system swap?

In many cases, yes. We extract data access, SQL and deployment step by step from the legacy structure and build a native, maintainable integration.

Do you also support operations and ongoing development?

Yes. Release processes, hosting, incident analysis, database maintenance and later extensions are part of our scope of work.

Read more on the topic

If you move from this FAQ to the in-depth technical page, you will find the broader context including architecture, examples, decision rationale and related topics.

View services in detail

Technologies

Technology and architecture overview

This FAQ bundles the typical orientation questions for technology decisions: when is Delphi a strong choice, when is C# the better building block, and how does a clean architecture bring multiple platforms, services and clients together in a controlled way?

Technological decisions must fit the team, the domain and the operational context. For that reason we do not discuss these questions abstractly, but always with the concrete system in mind.

When is Delphi preferable to a complete new platform?

Whenever established domain logic, performant desktop processes and multi-platform goals should be carried forward economically, rather than needlessly replacing core assets.

When should you additionally use C#?

Primarily for portals, web backends, REST services, integrations and service-oriented architectural parts that integrate well with existing desktop systems.

How important is Layer-3 in practice?

Very. Only a clean separation of UI, business logic and data access makes modernization, testing, services and future platform migrations manageable.

Do you consider new platforms such as Windows 11 ARM64 early on?

Yes. New target hardware and deployment paths are evaluated early so they do not later turn into costly special projects.

Read the topic in detail

If you move from this FAQ to the in-depth technical page, you will find the broader context including architecture, examples, decision rationale and related topics.

View technologies in detail

Projects

Project snapshots and reference patterns

Those who look at the projects page usually want to understand which type of undertaking we actually take on: one-off tools or longer-lived systems with operation, permissions model, versions, integrations and genuine ongoing development.

Many projects appear different at first and yet share common patterns: evolved domain logic, integrations, permissions, versions, operational concerns and long-term extensibility.

Do you work more on one‑off single tools or on longer‑lasting systems?

Our focus is on systems with an operational lifespan, responsibility and continued development: enterprise applications, platforms, services, portals and product logic.

Can existing products or internal systems be modernized in parallel?

Yes. Especially for long-standing systems we often plan phased evolution so that operation and modernization fit together.

Is hosting and technical operation part of your work?

Yes. Release, hosting, monitoring and operational responsibility are incorporated into our project planning so the finished solution is not only developed but also operated reliably.

Read the topic in detail

If you want to move from this FAQ to the in-depth specialist page, you will find the broader context there, including architecture, examples, decision rationale and adjacent topics.

View projects in detail

Enterprise software

Custom enterprise software & Layer-3

These questions typically arise when standard software is no longer functionally sufficient and a company wants to know whether a custom system can be built that is economically viable, maintainable and extensible.

With custom enterprise software it is not just about individual screens, but about roles, data, approval paths and an architecture that remains adaptable later on.

Is custom enterprise software only sensible for very large companies?

No. It is worthwhile whenever standard software represents processes only via workarounds, media breaks or costly special rules, and the actual value lies in clean domain logic.

Why do you emphasize Layer-3 so strongly in enterprise applications?

Because only the separation of UI, business logic and data access ensures that reporting, new clients, services and future extensions remain economically controllable.

Can you also engage with evolved legacy processes?

Yes. Especially in those cases our work is effective, because we first make business processes, existing data and legacy logic readable and from that develop a sustainable target architecture.

Read the topic in detail

If you want to move from this FAQ to the in-depth specialist page, you will find the broader context there, including architecture, examples, decision rationale and adjacent topics.

View custom enterprise software & Layer-3 applications in detail

Capabilities

Multiplatform with Delphi

At this point companies usually ask not only about a technical possibility, but about a reliable strategy: which parts remain shared, what must be handled platform-specifically and how to avoid creating an expensive parallel build?

Multiplatform becomes valuable only when the same domain logic remains controlled across multiple target systems and platform specifics are made visible early on.

Can Delphi be used to consider, alongside Windows, also macOS, Linux, iOS and Android?

Yes. Depending on the project goal we plan desktop targets, mobile interfaces and server-side components from a common domain line, instead of rebuilding the domain logic for each platform.

How do you prevent multiplatform projects from diverging functionally?

Through a shared code and architecture strategy: business rules, the data model and processes remain central, while platform-specific differences are deliberately encapsulated.

Are mobile expansions still possible later on?

Yes. If architecture, services and interfaces are prepared cleanly, iOS or Android targets can be attached later in a much more controlled way.

Read the topic in detail

If you move from this FAQ to the in-depth specialist page, you will find the broader context with architecture, examples, decision rationale and related topics.

View Multiplatform with Delphi in detail

Services

Services, REST-Server & Portale

Here, rights, data flows, logging and business rules must remain consistent. For that reason we treat the topic not as a web add-on but as an orderly extension of the same application lineage.

Portals, REST-APIs and services are only effective when they do not sit beside the core system functionally, but cleanly continue the same data and role logic.

Do you develop both REST servers and Windows and Linux services?

Yes. Background services, APIs, imports, exports, portals and technical operational logic are among our recurring task profiles.

When does an enterprise application additionally require a portal?

Whenever customers, partners or internal roles should access the same processes in a controlled way, without duplicating business rules across separate interfaces.

How do rights, logging and processes remain consistent between client and server?

By not hiding business rules in individual endpoints or UIs, but by creating a clear business core that client, portal and service can use jointly.

Read the topic in detail

If you move from this FAQ to the in-depth specialist page, you will find the broader context with architecture, examples, decision rationale and related topics.

View Services, REST-servers & portals in detail

Integration

Interfaces, data flows & platform objectives

These questions usually arise when data quality, traceability and future platform migrations become more important than the pure transfer of data from A to B.

Interfaces often appear as secondary topics. In reality they determine data quality, traceability, platform migration and stable operation.

Can existing interfaces and data flows be renewed without a Big Bang?

Yes. In many projects we reorganize mapping, database paths, jobs and integrations step by step so that real processes can continue.

Do you also take on financial accounting and third-party system integrations?

Yes. Especially accounting (Fibu), APIs, CRM, warehousing, licensing logic or industry-specific third-party systems must be integrated with clear documentation, observability and domain-level control.

Do you consider platform objectives like Windows 11 ARM64 in such integration projects from the start?

Yes. New target platforms, native dependencies and future deployment paths should be part of early planning alongside interfaces and data flow logic.

Read the topic in detail

If you navigate from this FAQ to the in-depth technical page, you will find the broader context covering architecture, examples, decision rationales and related topics.

View interfaces, data flows & platform goals in detail

Delphi

Delphi for enterprise applications

This addresses the fundamental question of when Delphi remains a deliberate architectural choice today and when other components should usefully complement or take over.

In companies, Delphi is rarely about nostalgia; it is about how established domain logic, desktop processes and multiple target platforms can be continued economically and cleanly.

Why would you still deliberately rely on Delphi today?

Because Delphi provides, in many enterprise applications, a strong combination of established business logic, high-performance desktop processes, close database proximity and controllable evolution.

Is Delphi only relevant for legacy modernization?

No. Delphi is also appropriate for new enterprise applications when productive desktop workflows, reports, local integration and a shared domain foundation for multiple platforms are important.

Where are the limits of Delphi?

Primarily where an initiative is mainly portal-, service- or cloud-centered. In those cases we deliberately combine Delphi with C#, REST-servers or web components instead of forcing everything into a single tool.

Continue reading the topic in detail

If you navigate from this FAQ to the in-depth technical page, you will find the broader context covering architecture, examples, decision rationales and related topics.

View Delphi for enterprise applications in detail

C#

C# for Services & Portals

This FAQ is aimed at companies that view C# not as an end in itself but as a robust building block for portals, APIs, integrations and service-oriented architecture components.

For us, C# is particularly strong when web portals, APIs, services, integrations and a stable operational profile are the primary focus.

When is C# the better choice compared to Delphi?

Especially when a project primarily consists of REST-APIs, portals, backend services, integrations or cloud-oriented operational models.

Do you also use C# together with existing Delphi systems?

Yes. That combination is often sensible: Delphi holds productive domain logic in the client, while C# cleanly complements services, portals and API layers.

What are typical risks in C# projects?

Often technically modern solutions are built too quickly without sufficiently early clear separation of roles, domain logic, logging, deployment and real operational concerns. That is exactly where we focus.

Continue reading the topic in detail

If you navigate from this FAQ to the in-depth technical page, you will find the broader context covering architecture, examples, decision rationales and related topics.

View C# for services and portals in detail

Architecture

Layer-3 architecture

Layer-3 is often explained theoretically. In practice, however, this structure directly determines whether new clients, services, tests and extensions integrate smoothly or break apart at high cost.

Layer-3 is not a textbook term but a practical response to grown monoliths, conflicting extensions and costly couplings in day-to-day operation.

Why is Layer-3 so important for enterprise applications?

Because only a clean separation of UI, business logic and data access ensures that extensions, tests, services and new platforms don’t immediately fail against the monolith.

Is Layer-3 only appropriate for large projects?

No. Medium-sized systems in particular benefit strongly, because future requirements can be integrated in a much more controlled way.

What is the most common mistake with Layer-3?

That layers are only drawn formally while the actual rules remain hidden in the UI code or in SQL special paths. Then the architecture exists only on slides, not in the system.

Read the topic in detail

If you want to move from this FAQ to the more detailed technical page, you’ll find the broader context there, with architecture, examples, decision criteria and related topics.

View Layer-3 architecture in detail

Delphi team

Delphi developers from Freiburg

This request is rarely just about an available person. Usually the underlying question is whether a partner can reliably take over the existing codebase, domain logic, data access and the technical direction.

When searching for Delphi developers it’s rarely only about available capacity. Mostly it’s about a reliable takeover of the existing system, architecture, data access and real domain responsibility.

When is an external Delphi developer appropriate?

Primarily when knowledge of the existing system is missing, modernization has stalled, or an application needs functional development without losing its substance.

Can you also take on established Delphi applications?

Yes. This is precisely a focus: we analyze legacy code, database, deployment, edge cases and business processes and then continue to build on that in a controlled way.

Is it only about programming or also about technical direction?

It explicitly also concerns direction. Good Delphi development for us includes architecture, data access, integrations, REST-services and the real-world operation.

Read the topic in detail

If you want to move from this FAQ to the more detailed technical page, you’ll find the broader context there, with architecture, examples, decision criteria and related topics.

View Delphi developers from Freiburg in detail

Support

Delphi maintenance & support

Maintenance often sounds smaller than it is. In practice it is about stable releases, visible risks, technical order and the question of how an evolved system can be further developed without disruption.

Maintenance for evolved Delphi systems is more than bug fixing. It concerns release stability, data consistency, technical debt and the question of how new requirements can be integrated into the existing system without disruption.

What is part of good Delphi maintenance?

Error analysis, further development, database maintenance, release support, technical documentation and an architecture that does not automatically make new requirements more expensive.

Can support start without a complete overhaul?

Yes. Often it begins with stabilization, making risks visible and a prioritized list of technical and functional improvements.

How do you reduce dependence on individual knowledge?

By documenting data paths, components, build steps and critical domain logic in a structured way and turning implicit knowledge back into traceable system logic.

Read the topic in detail

If you want to move from this FAQ to the more in-depth technical page, you will find there the broader context covering architecture, examples, decision rationales and related topics.

Delphi Maintenance & Support — view details

Modernization

Delphi Modernization

These answers are especially helpful where a legacy application remains strong functionally, but has accumulated too many technical bottlenecks to reliably carry new requirements.

The critical point in modernization is rarely just the UI. It is usually about domain logic, data, dependencies and a migration strategy that works in day-to-day operation.

Does an old Delphi application need to be completely replaced?

No. Often a controlled refactor is more appropriate: renew data access, decouple logic, introduce services and selectively modernize user interfaces.

How do you avoid operational disruptions during modernization?

Through clear intermediate stages, clean interfaces and a migration path where old and new parts can coexist in a controlled way.

Can existing domain logic later be moved into services or portals?

Yes. That’s exactly why we extract business logic from UI-bound legacy code and place it into a structure that clients, services and APIs can share.

Read the topic in detail

If you want to move from this FAQ to the more in-depth technical page, you will find there the broader context covering architecture, examples, decision rationales and related topics.

Delphi Modernization — view details

Data access

BDE Replacement

The BDE is rarely just an old driver. It is usually tied to historical SQL logic, database assumptions and deployment paths. That is precisely why we deliberately address the topic here in a slightly broader scope.

The BDE is rarely just a single technical component. It is tied to SQL, deployment, drivers, character sets and historical side effects. Therefore we treat the replacement as a modernization step and not as a component swap.

Is a switch to FireDAC or native drivers possible without a complete rebuild?

Yes, often in stages. It is important to examine SQL, data types, transactions and special cases thoroughly, rather than merely replacing components 1:1.

Why does the BDE replacement almost always also affect the database structure?

Because this often exposes old tables, indexes, character sets and historically grown SQL paths that should be cleaned up for stability and performance.

What do you gain concretely from native database connectivity?

Simpler deployment, better maintainability, controllable connections and a substantially better foundation for services, APIs and future extensions.

Read the topic in detail

If you want to move from this FAQ to the in-depth technical page, you will find there the broader context with architecture, examples, reasons for decisions and adjacent topics.

View the BDE replacement in detail

PostgreSQL

Delphi, PostgreSQL & FireDAC

Those who use PostgreSQL and BDE-Ablosung mit nativer Anbindung usually want more than just a new component. Behind it often lies the question of how data access, SQL, deployment and existing application logic can be brought back into a sustainable alignment.

With PostgreSQL and FireDAC it’s not just about a new connection component. Usually it implies a larger step toward more robust SQL, improved deployment and controllable data management.

When is PostgreSQL a good choice for Delphi?

Whenever stability, multi-user operation, clear SQL paths, open infrastructure and clean extensibility for desktop, services or portals are important.

Is FireDAC always the right way?

FireDAC is often a very good approach, but not a blind swap. Decisive are SQL behavior, data types, transactions, error paths and the specific existing system.

Can BDE-, Paradox- or old SQL systems migrate stepwise to PostgreSQL?

Yes. In many cases a controlled staged path is more economical than a hard cut, provided the data model and domain logic are thoroughly considered.

Read the topic in detail

If you want to move from this FAQ to the in-depth technical page, you will find there the broader context with architecture, examples, reasons for decisions and adjacent topics.

View Delphi, PostgreSQL & FireDAC in detail

Delphi REST

Delphi REST-API & REST-Server

This FAQ answers the typical fundamental question of whether REST with Delphi is merely a technical add-on or a serious server strategy. The decisive factor is always how cleanly client, rules, data and operations are integrated.

REST with Delphi becomes strong when APIs are not detached alongside the existing system, but instead cleanly carry permissions, business logic, the data model and operations.

Can you build production REST APIs with Delphi?

Yes. Especially when the same domain logic already lives in the Delphi installed base, a well-defined REST server is often more economical than an entirely new parallel world.

When is a REST server preferable to direct database access?

As soon as multiple clients, portals, services or integrations need to use the same rules in a controlled way and direct SQL access becomes functionally too risky.

How do you keep the Delphi client and REST consistent?

By an architecture in which business rules are not hidden in forms but are usable jointly by client, API and background processes.

Read the topic in detail

If you want to move from this FAQ to the in-depth technical page, you will find there the broader context with architecture, examples, decision criteria and related topics.

Delphi REST API & REST server — view in detail

Services

Windows- & Linux-Services

With services it is rarely only about a running process. More important are logging, observability, restart behavior, data consistency and the functional question which parts belong in the background and which do not.

Background services are often the invisible core of a system. They must run reliably, process state transitions cleanly and fit robustly into operations with logging, restart capability and monitoring.

When does an enterprise application additionally need Windows or Linux services?

Whenever imports, exports, scheduling, synchronization, license logic or integrations should not be tied to a logged-in desktop.

Can services and REST come from the same architecture?

Yes. That is often sensible, because business logic, the data model and logging do not split into multiple technical islands as a result.

What is especially important for productive services?

Clear error handling, observable states, restart resilience, logging, deployment and functionally consistent processing instead of silent background magic.

Read the topic in detail

If you want to move from this FAQ to the in-depth technical page, you will find there the broader context with architecture, examples, decision rationale and related topics.

Windows- & Linux-Services — view in detail

Technology

Delphi Multiplatform

This FAQ examines the technical side of the multiplatform strategy: codebase, packaging, system-level considerations, release processes and the question when multiple clients truly become economical.

Multiplatform only works cleanly when codebase, data model, platform differences and deployment are planned deliberately. That is exactly where the actual project value arises.

Can the same application really run on Windows, macOS and Linux?

Yes, provided presentation, business logic, platform-specific details and release processes are not mixed but cleanly structured.

What is the most common mistake in multiplatform projects?

Thinking too late about file system, printing, signing, target platforms, packaging and UI differences. Multiplatform development then quickly becomes expensive and inconsistent.

Can services and APIs use the same business logic?

Yes. A good architecture prevents each platform from developing its own idiosyncratic business logic.

Read the topic in detail

If you switch from this FAQ to the in-depth technical page, you will find the broader context including architecture, examples, decision factors and adjacent topics.

Delphi View Multiplatform in detail

Server architecture

REST-Server & Services

If APIs and services only sound technically modern but are not cleanly separated in terms of business logic, they quickly become a problem. This FAQ places these decisions in context.

Many systems do not fail because of the API idea, but because server logic is later improvised onto an existing desktop install base. We plan these parts deliberately together.

When does an enterprise application additionally require a REST server?

As soon as multiple clients, portals, mobile access, external integrations or decoupled processes should deliberately use the same business logic.

Do you also support Windows and Linux services?

Yes. Background processes, scheduling, synchronization, exports, licensing services and technical support processes are typical parts of our work.

How is functional consistency maintained between client, REST and service?

Through an architecture in which business rules are not hidden in individual UIs but remain jointly usable and traceable.

Read the topic in detail

If you switch from this FAQ to the in-depth technical page, you will find the broader context including architecture, examples, decision factors and adjacent topics.

View REST-Server & Services in detail

Platform

Windows 11 ARM64

ARM64 affects many applications earlier than expected. This FAQ answers typical questions about dependencies, tests, installers and the economic assessment of new target hardware.

ARM64 is no longer an exotic side topic but a real target platform. Those who consider it early avoid later technical dead-ends in deployment and with native dependencies.

Why should Windows 11 ARM64 already be considered today?

Because new hardware classes and mobile workplaces increasingly rely on it, and technical rework later is significantly more expensive than an early architectural decision.

What is particularly critical with Delphi and native dependencies on ARM64?

Above all, external libraries, database drivers, installers, setup processes and tests on actual target hardware must be verified early.

Does ARM64 require a completely separate product?

Not necessarily. Often it is sufficient to properly prepare build and deployment paths and to decouple critical native dependencies early enough.

Read the topic in detail

If you want to move from this FAQ to the more in-depth technical page, you will find there the broader context with architecture, examples, decision rationale and related topics.

Windows 11 ARM64 view in detail

Would you like this FAQ to become a concrete project discussion?

Then the next sensible step is not another collection of buzzwords, but a structured assessment of your inventory: which domain logic is present, where the current architecture is a bottleneck, which interfaces are critical and which expansion path is technically viable?

Start project inquiry

Next step

If you have a concrete modernization, API, or platform question, we should define the technical scope clearly and early.

Net-Base evaluates existing systems, data flows, interfaces and target platforms not in isolation but in the context of domain logic, operations and future extensibility.

  • Current state, target state and technical risks are assessed jointly.
  • REST, data access, portals and rollout are not deferred as afterthoughts.
  • You can determine early which path is economically and operationally viable.